Congress and the Trump administration are taking steps to reverse a 20-year ban on mineral leasing in the Superior National Forest near the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW). Rep. Pete Stauber supports the reversal and has submitted a Congressional Review Act resolution. Environmental groups warn that the move threatens the BWCA watershed and risks long-term environmental damage.
January 26, 2026 update:
Three years ago today, the Biden administration took steps to remove 225,504 acres within the Superior National Forest from mineral and geothermal leasing laws for a 20-year period.
In an effort to reverse that, last week, the House passed Joint Resolution 140, a bill introduced by Rep. Pete Stauber (MN-8). Stauber is taking steps to use the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to overturn the 20-year ban. It is now headed to the Senate for review. If the Senate votes in favor of overturning it, it will go to President Trump, who has said before that he supports overturning the mineral withdrawal and will sign it.
These actions could eventually allow Twin Metals, a Chilean-owned company, to renew its leases to mine copper within miles of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW). The complex would be built near the shoreline of Birch Lake, whose waters flow north into the BWCAW.
Opponents say that pollution from the mine will permanently impact those watersheds that flow north. In a recent Facebook post, Friends of the Boundary Waters said, “They voted to put the most polluting industry in America at the edge of our cleanest water. They voted to disregard protections for a national treasure.”
Others raised concerns not only about the BWCAW but also for other public lands. Lukas Leaf, executive director for Sportsmen for the Boundary Waters, told Outdoor Life that, “A decision to allow this to move forward could have dangerous implications not only for the BWCA but also for similar protections for wild landscapes across the country.”
According to a Reuters article, the House voted 214 to 208 to overturn the 20-year mineral withdrawal.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
January 14, 2026:
Late last week, the Trump administration took steps to reverse the Biden administration’s 20-year land withdrawal from mineral leasing on 225,504 acres of the Superior National Forest (SNF). The withdrawal protects areas such as the Boundary Waters from the impacts of new mineral exploration and development.
The 2023 withdrawal was issued by Interior Secretary Deb Haaland as Public Land Order 7917. It was published in the Federal Register, which provides public notice and makes the withdrawal legally effective.
Under the Federal Lands Policy and Management Act (FLPMA), mineral withdrawals are allowed. The Secretary of the Interior is supposed to notify both Houses of Congress of withdrawals of 5,000 acres or more. According to Reuters, which first reported on the issue, the Biden administration didn’t file notice in the Congressional Record. However, under FLPMA, that is not required; only a Federal Register publication is required, which was done by the Biden Administration.
At the beginning of January, the Dept. of the Interior, under Trump, sent the written notice to Congress. It was also forwarded to the U.S. Senate parliamentarian for review, though no public updates on the review have been released.
Mining interests optimistic
On January 12, Rep. Pete Stauber (MN-8) introduced a Congressional Review Act (CRA) disapproval resolution (H.J. Res. 140). This targets the 20-year mineral withdrawal in the Superior National Forest (SNF). Stauber has been a long supporter of opening up the area to more mining and reversing the withdrawal. Since 2023, Stauber has introduced legislation that would allow Twin Metals to reinstate its mineral leases.
If passed by both Houses and signed by Trump, the resolution could overturn the Biden administration’s 2023 ban on new mineral leases within the SNF. Twin Metals has been trying to reinstate two mineral leases and build a mine complex miles from the BWCAW border. Supporters of the mining industry argue that a new copper-nickel mine near Birch Lake could boost the economy and increase employment opportunities.
In his news release, Stauber stated,“I am proud to stand with the hardworking men and women of Northern Minnesota and protect our region’s way of life and our rich, 145-year mining history. I look forward to Congress’s swift consideration of H.J. Res. 140, so we can send this resolution to President Trump’s desk and prevent future administrations from enacting similar, dangerous mining bans in the future.”
Concerns grow over public land risks
Opponents say the Trump administration’s actions set an unprecedented precedent and threaten clean water, particularly in watersheds flowing into the BWCAW. They say it could undermine future public land policies. Legal experts note that the CRA has historically been used to overturn agency rules, not public land withdrawals, making this approach highly unusual.
Jordan Schreiber, director of government relations at the Wilderness Society, said, “Mining in the headwaters of the Boundary Waters would pollute one of the crown jewels of America’s public lands and pose a toxic threat to the Wilderness and the approximately 250,000 people who visit it each year. Congress should reject this legislative scheme, which relies on unprecedented treatment of a public land order, and defend this critical landscape for present and future generations.”
Locally, Ingrid Lyons, executive director of Save the Boundary Waters, said, “Using the Congressional Review Act to attack these protections also creates a reckless precedent that would allow Congress to retroactively target virtually any public land action as a ‘rule.’” If enacted, the resolution would not only overturn the current withdrawal but could also permanently restrict the Department of the Interior from issuing a similar protection in the future without congressional approval, a move critics say would handcuff future administrations.
Endangering “Minnesota’s most pristine waters”
Senator Tina Smith stated her concerns to MPR News. “Pete Stauber is once again seeking to endanger Minnesota’s most pristine waters just to line the pockets of a Chilean mining conglomerate.” Smith introduced legislation last year that would ban copper-nickel sulfide mining near the BWCAW.
Under the CRA, Congress has 60 legislative days to approve or reject the notice.
More info:
- Exclusive: Trump, Congress move to undo Biden-era ban on mining in northern Minnesota – Reuters
- Trump administration moves to reverse mining ban near Boundary Waters – MPR News
- Biden-Harris Administration Protects Boundary Waters Area Watershed – U.S. Department of of the Interior